South Carolina vote count begins to stink

 By Bill Cisowski

A foul and familiar wind rose around the South Carolina vote count this week and has settled across the internet.  The stunning victory that sent Newt Gingrich from a 15% approval rating to whopping 40% of the votes tallied was just too big a jump to be believed.  Viewed as a red flag signaling possible vote manipulation, by many pundits, it sent writers scurrying to seek out the stench behind such a foul wind.

Chris Lawton of the Ron Paul campaign was barred from witnessing the vote count as was his right, and told he could only view it outside by projector.  So a clear breach of law was apparent in South Carolina from the outset.  It becomes clear to many that the kingmakers wanted to use this opportunity to give Newt a boost hoping that it would slow the popular momentum gained recently by Mitt Romney.  Some believe the objective all along was to sully Romney who is viewed as an outsider by the kingmaker establishment and feel they are simply using Newt, knowing that with so many skeletons in his house he could never be elected.  This was intimated at recently during the John King CNN interview with Nancy Pelosi where she affirmed solidly that there was quote: "Something I know..." that would keep Gingrich from ever being president.

Newt Gingrich is the consumate politician who says one thing and then votes the opposite way.  Sound familiar?  Of course that's because they are owned and run by the same bosses.  More to come.

See related article by Brandon Turbeville